survival analysis model
PISA: An AI Pipeline for Interpretable-by-design Survival Analysis Providing Multiple Complexity-Accuracy Trade-off Models
Schlender, Thalea, Romme, Catharina J. A., van der Linden, Yvette M., van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R. C. W., Bosman, Peter A. N., Alderliesten, Tanja
Survival analysis is central to clinical research, informing patient prognoses, guiding treatment decisions, and optimising resource allocation. Accurate time-to-event predictions not only improve quality of life but also reveal risk factors that shape clinical practice. For these models to be relevant in healthcare, interpretability is critical: predictions must be traceable to patient-specific characteristics, and risk factors should be identifiable to generate actionable insights for both clinicians and researchers. Traditional survival models often fail to capture non-linear interactions, while modern deep learning approaches, though powerful, are limited by poor interpretability. We propose a Pipeline for Interpretable Survival Analysis (PISA) - a pipeline that provides multiple survival analysis models that trade off complexity and performance. Using multiple-feature, multi-objective feature engineering, PISA transforms patient characteristics and time-to-event data into multiple survival analysis models, providing valuable insights into the survival prediction task. Crucially, every model is converted into simple patient stratification flowcharts supported by Kaplan-Meier curves, whilst not compromising on performance. While PISA is model-agnostic, we illustrate its flexibility through applications of Cox regression and shallow survival trees, the latter avoiding proportional hazards assumptions. Applied to two clinical benchmark datasets, PISA produced interpretable survival models and intuitive stratification flowcharts whilst achieving state-of-the-art performances. Revisiting a prior departmental study further demonstrated its capacity to automate survival analysis workflows in real-world clinical research.
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.05)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Rotterdam (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Leiden (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
Fairness in Survival Analysis with Distributionally Robust Optimization
We propose a general approach for encouraging fairness in survival analysis models based on minimizing a worst-case error across all subpopulations that occur with at least a user-specified probability. This approach can be used to convert many existing survival analysis models into ones that simultaneously encourage fairness, without requiring the user to specify which attributes or features to treat as sensitive in the training loss function. From a technical standpoint, our approach applies recent developments of distributionally robust optimization (DRO) to survival analysis. The complication is that existing DRO theory uses a training loss function that decomposes across contributions of individual data points, i.e., any term that shows up in the loss function depends only on a single training point. This decomposition does not hold for commonly used survival loss functions, including for the Cox proportional hazards model, its deep neural network variants, and many other recently developed models that use loss functions involving ranking or similarity score calculations. We address this technical hurdle using a sample splitting strategy. We demonstrate our sample splitting DRO approach by using it to create fair versions of a diverse set of existing survival analysis models including the Cox model (and its deep variant DeepSurv), the discrete-time model DeepHit, and the neural ODE model SODEN. We also establish a finite-sample theoretical guarantee to show what our sample splitting DRO loss converges to. For the Cox model, we further derive an exact DRO approach that does not use sample splitting. For all the models that we convert into DRO variants, we show that the DRO variants often score better on recently established fairness metrics (without incurring a significant drop in accuracy) compared to existing survival analysis fairness regularization techniques.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.13)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Olmsted County (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Marion County > Indianapolis (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.49)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.47)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Oncology (0.92)
- Law (0.68)
A Deep Active Survival Analysis Approach for Precision Treatment Recommendations: Application of Prostate Cancer
Nezhad, Milad Zafar, Sadati, Najibesadat, Yang, Kai, Zhu, Dongxiao
Survival analysis has been developed and applied in the number of areas including manufacturing, finance, economics and healthcare. In healthcare domain, usually clinical data are high-dimensional, sparse and complex and sometimes there exists few amount of time-to-event (labeled) instances. Therefore building an accurate survival model from electronic health records is challenging. With this motivation, we address this issue and provide a new survival analysis framework using deep learning and active learning with a novel sampling strategy. First, our approach provides better representation with lower dimensions from clinical features using labeled (time-to-event) and unlabeled (censored) instances and then actively trains the survival model by labeling the censored data using an oracle. As a clinical assistive tool, we introduce a simple effective treatment recommendation approach based on our survival model. In the experimental study, we apply our approach on SEER-Medicare data related to prostate cancer among African-Americans and white patients. The results indicate that our approach outperforms significantly than baseline models.
- North America > United States > Michigan > Wayne County > Detroit (0.04)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Montgomery County > Bethesda (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)